Asus and MSI are accused of juicing GeForce GTX 1080 graphics card review samples - warrentergelet

Graphics card maker EVGA isn't a company that lets an opportunity die off to waste, and it seized vantage of a doozy aft TechPowerUp and new sites outed Asus and MSI o'er GeForce GTX 1080 survey sampling shenanigans.

On Tues, EVGA sent unstylish a graphic to press stating that it does not deliver graphics cards with tweaked clockspeeds to reviewers. "With EVGA," the society said. "What you see is what you get."

What it's all well-nig

The undiversified controversy started on Thursday of last week. TechPowerUp reported that both Asus and MSI sent the hardware-focused site graphics cards set to run slightly faster than what you'd get from a outlet.

The hope, obviously, was that Asus and MSI would view break reviews for their products and get an edge over the competition.

Burn.

The companies also had an excuse for the tweaked clock speeds, since customers could easily get the same speeds the reviewers were seeing. All they had to practise was insolent a setting in the special software that comes with all new graphics card. MSI has a software package called MSI Gaming, while Asus offers GPU Fine-tune II.

These graphics cards attach to cardinal basic clock settings that users fundament easily cook up: gaming mode, OC ("overclock") mode, and silent manner. The first is the standard retail background that most of us see when we unfold those glorious boxes housing a new gateway to gambling joyfulness.

Uncommunicative mode runs the slowest of the three since it puts the bill of fare at reference clock speeds. OC modal value, meantime, squeezes a slight more performance out of the card. TechPowerUp said it received cards set to OC mode, meaning they were minded review samples prepare to a profile that offers more public presentation than what buyers really receive in stores.

Shortly after that initial report, PC Perspective agreed this was a fearful practise along the persona of the companies. Just PC Perspective also pointed impermissible that the difference in speeds mightiness result in close to a one percent performance improvement overall. (What did you require for a straightaway, one-click tweak?)

Nevertheless, TechPowerUp argues that even a small performance gain provides an unfair advantage. That moderate boost could, in fact, be the deciding ingredien for gamers looking to squeeze every ounce of public presentation they can from a special artwork card.

Asus confirmed to Personal computer Perspective that it does send its cards to reviewers in OC Mode ready to showcase the card's maximum performance.

Why this matters: Technically, some companies can say the cards sent to reviewers and to retail stores are the same since they only pull off a factory setting. The marginal improvement in clock speed is also easy obtained by consumers if they enable the right profile for their card. Nevertheless, companies shouldn't mail reviewers a product that doesn't match what consumers get, just down to the factory settings. That's especially important for graphics cards reviews where umpteen readers skip right to the benchmarks to compare numbers game.

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/415330/asus-and-msi-accused-of-juicing-geforce-gtx-1080-graphics-card-review-samples.html

Posted by: warrentergelet.blogspot.com

Share this post